> The art now is created by the people who can afford to create it because they know they are getting paid. True, but not in the sense you mean. Certain arts d

> The art now is created by the people who can afford to create it because they know they are getting paid. True, but not in the sense you mean. Certain arts die off and certain ones flourish. There is tons more digital art and computer animation, and less poetry and jazz artists. Why are you preferring one over another? Both are equally valid, except digital art and computer animation you can make a living off of. > Personal projects like freelancing can put your home at risk. How exactly is that? You might have to still work a job for stable income. Read Stephen King's "On Writing". He says that the idea that a creative person needs large chunks of uninterrupted time is ridiculous. If you really want to do something, you'll make time to do it. > At least in Spain, people until their 30s live in the parents home because they cant get a decent job in many cases. Why is that a problem? The idea of moving out at an early age has arisen with the baby boom generation. It's quite a recent phenomenon. In asia, you're not expected to move out until you get married and have a family. What's your point?