3 ms·
Agree completely. An ambiguous referendum that gave no guidance. An unelected PM who has taken it upon herself to define the most egregious future path. The onl
by sandbags 10y ago
Agree completely. An ambiguous referendum that gave no guidance. An unelected PM who has taken it upon herself to define the most egregious future path. The only ethical stance is to set out definite terms (which I guess she is now doing) and hold a general election (which I am 100% sure she will not).
- SixSigma 10y ago> An unelected PM She was elected by her party, just like Cameron was.
- headmelted 10y agoNot the same. While on the surface this is correct, Cameron subsequently ran as the face of the party in a general election before assuming office, thereby receiving a public mandate (albeit a weak one first time round due to the hung parliament). May did not.
- SixSigma 10y agoThat assumption is just that.
- lgeek 10y agoHer only opponent quit, she was the only one running.
- SixSigma 10y agoSee also Michael Howard, 2003 John Major, 1990 Margaret Thatcher, 1975
- gaius 10y agoAnd just like Corbyn. That's the way it's always worked in the UK - we don't have a "president". Amazing how many people don't understand this.