4 ms·
> But the people who designed the page in the first place should be able to make it just as fast without using AMP. ...but they don't, which is the point. I'l
by magicalist 10y ago
> But the people who designed the page in the first place should be able to make it just as fast without using AMP.
...but they don't, which is the point.
I'll throw my hat in on being a fan of reading news on AMP pages as well (though reddit amp does seem completely broken). I wouldn't care in the least if news site x instead wrote a fast site, I'd happily use that instead. But until they do, yeah, as a user I'll click on the amp link first.
- JustSomeNobody 10y agoAnd I'm the opposite. I do my best to NOT use AMP pages. If a site can't be bothered to optimize it's own pages, then they don't get my attention/money/whatever. I can do without. Let the best developed sites win.
- swiley 10y agoIt would be a lot better if instead they just ranked pages with slow load times and JavaScript lower, oh wait, that makes it harder for ads...