3 ms·
I shouldn't judge based on a remembered, secondhand, out of context quote, but this sounds kind of... pretentious.
by woah 10y ago
I shouldn't judge based on a remembered, secondhand, out of context quote, but this sounds kind of... pretentious.
- justinpombrio 10y agoYou might have read it backwards: the message was very humble. Moxie was saying that he didn't deserve credit for what he had built, because if he had not built it someone else would have. So his work was best thought of as a product of history, rather than a product of Moxie.
- snowpanda 10y agoThat's because it is pretentious and politically loaded. The guy acts like he cured cancer and tries to throw in his political ideologies. Meanwhile he's stubbornly defending WhatsApp and dismissing any criticism of the security flaw featured in The Guardian. Or any work towards a Signal without Google Play Services. Or most forms of criticism really. Unfortunately, most people on here follow along with anything he says, no matter how bad advice it is. Which is most likely why he won the award.
- girvo 10y agoI think we must have read two different speeches, because the one I read was Moxie stating that the invention of Signal was an inevitability, not him taking credit for it. But then it kind of sounds like you have an axe to grind on this topic?
- tptacek 10y agoThe Levchin Award recipients are determined by the RWC Steering Committee, which this year was Dan Boneh, Aggelos Kiayias, Brian LaMacchia, Kenny Paterson, Tom Ristenpart, Tom Shrimpton, and Nigel Smart. I think we can safely assume Moxie's popularity on HN had very little to do with persuading these people.
- idlewords 10y agoRedditors one and all!
- sk5t 10y agoOn the contrary, while it conveys some difficult ideas, I find it quite humble to acknowledge that one's individual contribution to technology is not an act of genius but of inevitability.