3 ms·
Highways (tolls) tend to be far less profitable than rail systems (ticket sales). If the US didn't like government subsidies, we wouldn't have built all these h
by akshayn 10y ago
Highways (tolls) tend to be far less profitable than rail systems (ticket sales). If the US didn't like government subsidies, we wouldn't have built all these highways.
- ytruytr 10y agoDo you have a source on this? In my state the government used the tolls roads as a cash cow, they were massively profitable. The funny thing was the toll roads still sucked because they dumped all the money into the general fund to pay for everything else
- chiph 10y agoJust like about a quarter of the motor-fuels tax that is supposed to go into the highway trust fund.
- Alupis 10y ago> If the US didn't like government subsidies, we wouldn't have built all these highways You can't disregard the history of the highways, or the reason they were first built - for the military in the name of national security.
- twoodfin 10y agoA moderate increase in user fees (gas taxes today, mileage fees in an electric future) could readily fund all capital and maintenance costs for the US interstate system. Gas wouldn't have to be that much more expensive than it was 4-5 years ago. The system would endure and could even be profitable. No such fee structure could plausibly fund any rail system outside the NE Corridor. Prices adequate to sustain the network, let alone build it up, would put ridership into a death spiral.