4 ms·
Ruby would be great as well, even though Eclipse's ruby support is not the best among IDEs. Maybe this could encourage this situation to change it. Not sure if
by DanielRibeiro 17y ago
Ruby would be great as well, even though Eclipse's ruby support is not the best among IDEs. Maybe this could encourage this situation to change it.
Not sure if you already implemented it, but from the video it feels you click a lot when navigating through the uml graphs. Showing all nodes on the uml graph within a distance of 2 or 3 (depending on the ammount of nodes) would make it less clicky. Not to mention that a node on its own not really useful.
Grats on the very nice tool.
- sethrq 17y agoRuby support may be implemented down the road depending on customer demand. Many UML tools add too much info automatically, we have a number of features that allow users to add the nodes they care about with a single context menu click: Show Super/Subtype Hierarchy, show Extending/Extended Classes, and show referencing types / methods.
- vineet 17y agoTo elaborate what Seth said: We did try showing nodes automatically, but it often ended up with too much and users where forced to spend most of their time removing. We will investigate further different version of adding nodes automatically.
- vineet 17y agoBTW, glad you like the tool.