2 ms·
Those are probably fairly common in image compression standards - designers of image compression are not, in general, going to make their compression less effic
by makomk 10y ago
Those are probably fairly common in image compression standards - designers of image compression are not, in general, going to make their compression less efficient than it has to be. JPEG2000 in particular is likely to be far worse.
- gcp 10y agoNot at all. Decode performance is generally a very important consideration, as it has to go in all kinds of devices. Unbounded decoding time would be terrible (it would "lock up" embedded devices), and it's almost certainly an oversight. You probably have encoding performance in mind, where there's much more liberty to make things very heavy.
- nl 10y agoNo, the opposite is true. Fast decompression is usually either the first or second priority for images.
- jstimpfle 10y agoI don't think you disagree with your parent.