Despite not being an egregious case, I think the flagging's fair. As others pointed out [0], the article's premise is silly and just an annual refresh of Oxfam

Despite not being an egregious case, I think the flagging's fair. As others pointed out [0], the article's premise is silly and just an annual refresh of Oxfam's dubious statistic. Thus, WRT HN's submission guidelines, the article's off-topic and not "evidence of some interesting new phenomenon." [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13407849 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13407849