The second half of your post reads like word salad made from headlines about ML. They're all words, but the fact that you thought they form a thought with seman

The second half of your post reads like word salad made from headlines about ML. They're all words, but the fact that you thought they form a thought with semantic content makes me worried. We need fewer MBAs coked out of their mind meddling with this stuff. The advancements that are interesting in ML mostly come from deep statistics and information theory and very sophisticated analysis, not combining the most popular black boxes that you read a medium post about.