'Justice' is not conventionally understood as being synonymous with law. You're employing a highly unconventional definition of 'justice' which would make your

'Justice' is not conventionally understood as being synonymous with law. You're employing a highly unconventional definition of 'justice' which would make your statements misleading to most. >You need to use the same definitions of words that everyone else is using. Everyone else does not use the same definition of justice as you. This is how justice is usually defined (first definition found through a Google search): >Justice definition, the quality of being just; righteousness, equitableness, or moral rightness: to uphold the justice of a cause. just: >just jəst/ adjective 1. based on or behaving according to what is morally right and fair. When used in the context of laws, justice refers to a legal remedy that is morally right, equitable, etc. Legal rulings are not automatically considered justice on account of being from the state. State actions everywhere, including in the US, are widely characterized as unjust, a miscarriage of justice, etc., when they are considered immoral. I suggest you stop being stubborn, because you're wrong.