I'm not convinced that a "logical form" can exist. It suggests there is a one true universal language of description which does not rely on context. But I'd arg

I'm not convinced that a "logical form" can exist. It suggests there is a one true universal language of description which does not rely on context. But I'd argue that any language reduces the objects it describes to symbols, and there is no way to agree on such a reduction without some base agreed contextual understanding.