3 ms·
Recently I switched to a single 27" 2560x1440 monitor as well. Before that, I was using two old matching 20" 4:3 monitors, one in 1600x1200 configuration, and
by Nition 10y ago
Recently I switched to a single 27" 2560x1440 monitor as well.
Before that, I was using two old matching 20" 4:3 monitors, one in 1600x1200 configuration, and the secondary one in portrait 1200x1600.
Sometimes I miss being able to easily throw something over onto the second monitor, and the total screen real estate is a little less overall, but generally windows-key + arrow snapping gets the job done pretty well when I need to see two things at once.
Talking to some other devs where I work though (many of us work remotely), a lot have two or even three 27" monitors. I hardly even have the desk space for that... unless I stacked them vertically maybe.
- egeozcan 10y ago> I hardly even have the desk space for that I'd suggest you buy monitor arms. They really save a lot of space and make your setup way more ergonomic. I use 3 of these: https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B00358RIRC https://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B00358RIRC They also have dual-arms.
- Nition 10y agoYeah, I could make it work somehow if I really want to. Has anyone here tried two monitors vertically like this? http://i.imgur.com/TY9km4h.jpg http://i.imgur.com/TY9km4h.jpg I don't look at a secondary monitor nearly as much as my primary so I feel like it could work, and I like that it's not super wide like dual widescreens, but I also know it could be terrible for your neck.
- patates 10y agoIt wouldn't work that way. Bottom monitor needs to be higher for the well being of your neck and then, top monitor would be too high. I can't see this working long term.