4 ms·
Seems much more drastically editorialized, to be honest. My first impression reading the headline was that there was some sort of ethical dispute resulting in a
by eganist 10y ago
Seems much more drastically editorialized, to be honest. My first impression reading the headline was that there was some sort of ethical dispute resulting in a ban (why else would you be unable to publish in "top journals?"). This bit of data regarding the open access requirement--also present in the opening paragraph of the article--offers a ton of clarity, but given the conflict of interest, the title itself is pretty rich.