25 ms·
Personally, aside from something passive like a zoo, I don't care for anything that relies on animal performance for entertainment. That includes dog racing, h
by Esau 10y ago
Personally, aside from something passive like a zoo, I don't care for anything that relies on animal performance for entertainment. That includes dog racing, horse racing, and things like circuses and even Seaworld.
I know many people don't care but it bothers me.
- wavefunction 10y agoZoos are inhumane for many animals in my personal opinion. Many animals should be ranging a territory in the wild, not confined to a tiny plot of land to be gawked at. I don't find the 'conservation' excuse all that acceptable either. What if the millions spent on Zoos were instead spent to conserve the native territories of the animals and to improve the lives of the people who live near them so they won't resort to poaching or habitat destruction.
- afarrell 10y ago> or habitat destruction Doesn't this come mostly from clearing land for agriculture?
- CuriouslyC 10y agoYes, some animals get stressed out living in zoos. That being said, it is probably the least stressful way that people can appreciate animals in real life. There is some value in bringing people face to face with animals, I think it reconnects us with the basis of our humanity, and leads us to treat animals better overall. Does the moral math work out in the end? I don't know, but it isn't a one sided issue.
- JustSomeNobody 10y agoThis is my thinking as well. Zoos are kind of a necessary evil so we don't completely concrete all jungles, etc. Humans are horrible caretakers of this planet.
- code_chimp 10y agoSome zoos are actually centers of research and teaching. http://www.omahazoo.com/conservation/ http://www.omahazoo.com/conservation/
- jonwachob91 10y ago>What if the millions spent on Zoos were instead spent to conserve the native territories A lot of zoos are funded 100% off ticket sales. How do you generate those millions of dollars without some business model supporting it?
- Drdrdrq 10y agoTrue, but - there wouldn't be any millions if these (poor imho) animals weren't confined in small places. Planet 1: "Hey there, long time no see, how are you doing? :-)" Planet 2: "not too good lately... :-( I got infected by humans..."
- taeric 10y agoThis is a funny joke.... But ultimately nonsense. Any other planets with any life? At best, it is looking like most life dies off. Conway's game is incredibly fitting in that.
- Houshalter 10y agoI dont know where this idea comes from that animals in the wild are happy. Most live short brutal lives. Living in a zoo, free from predators, plenty of food, and veterinary care when they are sick. Its sort of like an animal utopia.
- mathgeek 10y ago> Living in a zoo, free from predators, plenty of food, and veterinary care when they are sick. Its sort of like an animal utopia. Replace "zoo" with "modern society", and vets with hospitals. Sounds pretty similar to what a lot of people strive for. The common argument against that comparison is animals don't have a choice in the matter, while we are free to flee.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- brianwawok 10y agoNFL Football and boxing are perhaps more inhuman than those activities. You should add sports that fry the participant's brains to the list of things to not support
- filoeleven 10y agoI don't think they're more imhumane, simply because people get to choose whether or not to participate in them, unlike the animals. And in fact now that we have this information, support for football is starting to decline at the high school level at least. Not by much yet but it could be a trend.
- hueving 10y agoMany children start playing football because of peer pressure and parental pressure. It's not as much of simple choice as you think. If the bar was "the kid could technically decide not to", then we would allow advertising cigarettes to children.
- CocaKoala 10y agoNobody's going into the NFL because of peer pressure.
- adamnemecek 10y agoZoos really differ in their treatment of animals too btw.