3 ms·

I prefer 'Zuckerpunched' over 'Zucked" - implies a level of underhandedness. And I think the various items on the list represent different things. Duplicating

• megablast 17y ago
  Exactly. You are not stealing anything from Foursquare, or twitter, unless the whole industry is stealing from everybody all the time. Personally, as much as I fear facebook taking too much control, I don't see either of these as being big issues. I don't put important stuff on my fb account, and most people I know do not care that all this information is available. These are the same people who see absolutely nothing wrong with supermarkets loyalty cards, and their details being sold off to other companies. This is the majority now, who think more CCTV cameras are a good idea and make the world safer, who agree with more stringent airline boarding procedures, and support the government taking away out rights if they want to. This is the world we live in, privacy has been slowely eroded away for a number of years now, and there are much more important stuff to worry about on the entertainment news shows.
• to_jon 17y ago
  Half of his rant focuses on Zuck 'stealing' features from other websites and potential competitors. Since when did adding new features that someone else invented become a moral issue? In many industries, that's standard practice. Google didn't exactly invent email. There's no moral standard to apply here. His other assertions about Zuck screwing over past partners is more troubling.