4 ms·
I took the bait because the title seemed counterintuitive, or perhaps my eyes delighted over the caps. Bait indeed. The post is horrible because it lacks info
by endswapper 10y ago
I took the bait because the title seemed counterintuitive, or perhaps my eyes delighted over the caps.
Bait indeed.
The post is horrible because it lacks information, it's dated and at this point it's irrelevant.
Curation jobs will be highly automated, and soon. Machine learning and AI will make computers better at curation jobs. And they may already be better.
The long winded DJ example was pointless. Plenty of music streaming and other services for fashion, food, etc. use computers to curate.
Lame.
- gus_massa 10y agoI agree, but the comment would have been better without the "lame" at the end. From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > In Comments > Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say in a face-to-face conversation. Avoid gratuitous negativity. > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. E.g. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
- endswapper 10y agoYou appear to be assuming a negative, perhaps juvenile connotation, of my usage of the word. My intention wasn't to be negative, gratuitously, or otherwise. And I wasn't calling names. I stand by the sentiment, unconvincingly feeble. lame[0] lām adjective 2. (of an explanation or excuse) unconvincingly feeble. [0] https://www.google.com/search?q=lame https://www.google.com/search?q=lame