This article is basically, "VR gets a vote of confidence from YC". That's good to know, but: a) It should be pointed out that this is what the article is doing

This article is basically, "VR gets a vote of confidence from YC". That's good to know, but: a) It should be pointed out that this is what the article is doing (giving a vote of confidence, not summarizing, not making any sort of thorough or novel argument). b) I think that thorough and novel arguments are more useful. The following post comes to mind: http://www.overcomingbias.com/2016/09/write-to-say-stuff-worth-knowing.html http://www.overcomingbias.com/2016/09/write-to-say-stuff-wor....