2 ms·
As an individual, I agree. As a company, however, I think it's a good move, because not every individual will agree or be able to negotiate for oneself. If a co
by faitswulff 10y ago
As an individual, I agree. As a company, however, I think it's a good move, because not every individual will agree or be able to negotiate for oneself. If a company hasn't hired that individual to do negotiation, then I don't see why they should reward or punish that employee for negotiation skills. Hence Lever's neutrality on negotiation.
- amorphid 10y agoIs there a happy compromise that is good for both a company and its employees? One thought that comes to mind is hazard pay in the military. A and B are in same role and share the same base pay. But A works at a desk, and gets no hazard pay. B goes to war, and gets paid extra for dodging bullets.