3 ms·
During my training, at one point, I helped in a BIND4-to-BIND9-migration. I learned more about DNS than I ever wanted to know (and then even more to avoid havin
by krylon 10y ago
During my training, at one point, I helped in a BIND4-to-BIND9-migration. I learned more about DNS than I ever wanted to know (and then even more to avoid having to learn Rexx). (I have forgotten most of it since.)
I set up a DNS server for my LAN to see if I had understood what I had read.
Haven't looked back since. The main advantage, initially, was performance, but it has other advantages, too.
Although, now that you mention it, I kind of do use BIND9. It hasn't been that much work over the years, really. I am open to alternatives, but so far, I have not found a solution that would be easier to maintain and serve both as a recursive resolver and as an authoritative nameserver for my local zone. (I do admit that I did not look very hard, because the current situation with BIND works for me.)
- drdaeman 10y agoPowerDNS is nice. Basic setup is as simple as BIND9's, and their backend system is very flexible, so if you encounter yourself in need of something uncommon, you can probably still have it easily (using "pipe" backend and a bit of scripting language of your choice).
- krylon 10y agoThanks! I'll take a look at it!