> VR doesn't even replicate reality, let alone do more. Why does that make any sense? That's like arguing Pac Man doesn't replicate reality so video games are

> VR doesn't even replicate reality, let alone do more. Why does that make any sense? That's like arguing Pac Man doesn't replicate reality so video games are bad. It's funny LaserDiscs are on the list when DVD and Bluray took off like crazy -- LaserDiscs were just ahead of their time once the technology was right, it took off. The same is true for VR -- the question is not whether or not it will take off but whether or this is the point it's viable. I just got a Gear VR last week and while it's not perfect it feels like the right point and that's just powered by my cell phone.