3 ms·
Nice. My first thought that it was Ponzi in nature (relying on increasing uptake to "staff" the judgements), but then I realised that if each uploader has to m
by blahedo 16y ago
Nice. My first thought that it was Ponzi in nature (relying on increasing uptake to "staff" the judgements), but then I realised that if each uploader has to make several judgements themselves, that should be enough to fuel the operation.
- Goosey 16y agoCurrently they seem to be running into a bit of a supply issue. I keep 'running out of people to pick'. It looks like you need something along the lines of (number_of_pics * 20) votes to get your rating back, so they have a bit of an inflationary issue. It probably doesn't help that I am male and voting on female pics. My intuition is that more males are participating in uploading/voting, so there is a gap in female picture supply.