30k hands (as opposed to 20k in the first experiment) is usually still not large enough of a sample size from a player's perspective to overcome up and downswin

30k hands (as opposed to 20k in the first experiment) is usually still not large enough of a sample size from a player's perspective to overcome up and downswings. I suppose a compromise must have been made out of respect for the player's time. I would be very interested in seeing everyone's equity vs actual winnings at the end. The pay per hand is very good for any normal mid to higher stakes reg player, but I wonder if these guys are taking a pay cut to participate... considering these guys probably charge $500 - $1000 an hour for coaching, and that's aside from their table winnings. I haven't been in the poker scene for some time now, and am a bit out of touch. I wish we could get some real time player commentary. I would love to see how they adapt with their thought process.