4 ms·
Pale Moon does not completely ignore these though as you seem to be suggesting, they indeed do at least try to patch these. And I'm betting most of the time t
by problems 10y ago
Pale Moon does not completely ignore these though as you seem to be suggesting, they indeed do at least try to patch these.
And I'm betting most of the time they succeed. There may be a few weird ones with edge cases that they've screwed up though and some subset of the vulnerability is still possible.
- temprature 10y agoScroll through Mozilla's security announcements, pick ones at random, find the patch that fixed it and see if it ever got applied to Pale Moon. In many cases they haven't. I have pointed out many of these and argued with Pale Moon devs about it. "Moon Child" believes they don't need to apply patches if they can't replicate the PoC from Mozilla's bugzilla. These are things that are obviously vulnerable and need to be fixed (such as missing bound checks in the XML parser). If someone ever cared enough to target Pale Moon users they would have an absolute field day with all the known Firefox vulnerabilities they could use.