3 ms·
Sure, it's in the name itself (open), but what's the rush then? In AI safety, the time left to solve the problem is a crucial factor. Of course it can be measur
by openthrowawAI 10y ago
Sure, it's in the name itself (open), but what's the rush then? In AI safety, the time left to solve the problem is a crucial factor. Of course it can be measured in man-years instead of years. Still, what's the big rush, or can we at least see some calculations? Democratization is different/orthogonal to pushing the boundaries of research.
I'm not saying releasing gym and universe was a bad choice. Honestly, I can't say. But can we see a rationale?
One can read this piece and see it as a group of super driven and uber competent people designing a super, faster car, open sourced with a 3D printer for the parts etc, without thinking about the lack of safe roads. It's a jungle out there. And in this case, one wild fast car is enough for a disaster.
- visarga 10y agoLet's not be naive, it will be like virus vs anti-virus. Some bad people will try to make dangerous AI, at some point. The balance will be held by applying AI against AI.