3 ms·
I don't think we need any partisan bickering to address your point: It seems they should have named it something more appropriate, like the Universal Health In
by loteck 10y ago
I don't think we need any partisan bickering to address your point:
It seems they should have named it something more appropriate, like the Universal Health Insurance Act.
The name of the bill is a lot less important to most people than the substance. If you read Sam's post, there is a man in there with a heart condition who is essentially uninsurable without the ACA. For him, the word "Affordable" definitely applies, but he doesn't care what the bill's title is. In my opinion, you shouldn't either, because the bill's substance is what is important.
- danjoc 10y agoSubstance? Health care costs continue growing significantly faster than inflation since the passage of the Affordable Care Act. >In my opinion, you shouldn't either It's clear to me, I need to leave and go to a country with a higher average IQ. They, unsurprisingly, have figured out how to deliver actual affordable care. The people here are too ignorant to actually solve this problem. Even "smart" people have been completely brainwashed by propaganda. Affordable care is more expensive. War is Peace. Ignorance is Strength.