3 ms·
This post, especially presented as it is through the voices of these founders, makes an important point. However, missing, as far as I can tell, is the critiqu
by jMyles 10y ago
This post, especially presented as it is through the voices of these founders, makes an important point.
However, missing, as far as I can tell, is the critique of health care that startups and the open source movement stand to make - a point which the ACA ignores:
Health care has a gatekeeper problem. And an IP problem. Many people find that medical doctors are only a part - maybe a small part - of their health care regiment. And that being and staying healthy has little in common with the official positions of agencies from HHS (especially FDA) to EPA.
The ACA enshrines insurance, pharma, and hospital companies, including those that are the biggest parts of the problem in health care in the USA.
For my part, I need to hear how we can move away from the credentialist model of care toward an open source model before I can become impassioned about any plan.
- wonder_er 10y ago> The ACA enshrines insurance, pharma, and hospital companies, including those that are the biggest parts of the problem in health care in the USA. Absolutely agree. The ACA (or repealing the ACA) are both "solutions" to the wrong problem. So much potential innovation in the health care space is illegal. If it wasn't illegal, someone might (gasp!) find a way to provide a valuable service for less money than in the current system. It will not, and cannot, be fixed by regulation, because of what you said - any regulation MUST be approved by the big companies. They'll never approve something that goes against their interests.