4 ms·
What Hayek said is that the bubbles popped pretty early on (which is a good thing) because they could not be maintained and continued by the institutions that e
by arvinjoar 16y ago
What Hayek said is that the bubbles popped pretty early on (which is a good thing) because they could not be maintained and continued by the institutions that existed back then. That the bubbles popped is a good thing. A gold standard keeps the inflation stable, because gold can't be printed. Hayek goes on to say that a gold standard would not work because governments have an incentive to "cheat" and blow up giant bubbles, which cannot be done successfully with a gold standard.
I think that currency should not be issued by governments at all, the absence of government issued money would mean competing currencies, and in a situation where gold competes with other currencies, gold often wins the confidence of the people.
- evanrmurphy 16y agoThat would be an interesting item to deregulate. I've always been fascinated that the U.S. government doesn't mandate an official language [1] and just incidentally uses English for most purposes (with Spanish becoming increasingly relevant). As far as I can tell, it hasn't caused any major problems for the country and may be a better way to handle the issue. Could currency be the same way? [1] Language being another item that governments tend to regulate.