4 ms·
Companies don't make money off of performance.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Companies don't make money off of performance.
- Domenic_S 10y agoThat's just patently false. One of many, many articles to the contrary: http://blog.gigaspaces.com/amazon-found-every-100ms-of-latency-cost-them-1-in-sales/ http://blog.gigaspaces.com/amazon-found-every-100ms-of-laten...
- goostavos 10y agoUh.. they've already _bought_ the car. What percentage of people will return a car due to a little lag when adjusting radio stations? e-commerce findings from a major retailer are, alas, not applicable to every domain
- wnevets 10y agoWell he did say Companies, not Auto Companies. There are a lot of companies that make money by having better performance.
- chris72205 10y agoSomeone may choose to not buy a car after test driving it and experiencing the laggy touchscreen...or after reading reviews by people who did already buy the car.
- teddyc 10y agoConsumer Reports has found that the functionality of the in-car entertainment system is the #1 indicator of customer satisfaction. You might not return the car, but you can bad mouth the system to anyone who will listen and purchase a different brand car next time.
- will_pseudonym 10y agoLack of performance is an attribute that would contribute to a potential consumer's attitude towards the whole car. It may not have as huge of an impact as it would for Amazon, but saying it has no effect is definitely wrong.
- ashmud 10y agoThey can. I bought a Roku 3 after seeing how much more responsive it was compared to my Sony BDP-S790 for streaming apps.
- amiga-workbench 10y agoI've got a Sony BDP-S1700 which has an equally sluggish interface, the "powered by Java" badge on the back makes me laugh.
- kluck 10y agoThough they might not nessessarily be able to use it in marketing (most customers might think that UI should always be fast) and not charge a premium for "fast" UI, they might lose potential customers due to bad reputation.