> The classes were of very poor quality - it was clear that they were a low priority for most faculty. I took a master's in aerospace engineering at a top tier

> The classes were of very poor quality - it was clear that they were a low priority for most faculty. I took a master's in aerospace engineering at a top tier school and I wonder if this is the norm for grad engineering courses, and for many lower-level undergrad courses as well (think massive freshman calculus lectures). To calibrate what you consider "poor quality," how did you find the quality of your undergrad engineering courses?