> But that doesn't get clicks. This is an attack on he article, but the article made quite clear that measuring productivity is notoriously challenging! You di

> But that doesn't get clicks. This is an attack on he article, but the article made quite clear that measuring productivity is notoriously challenging! You didn't have to look far - just the first sentence of the second paragraph: > Measuring productivity is far from easy; it tends to be the residual left over when all other factors have been accounted for. The OECD says it "can often be a measure of our ignorance". You've accused the authors of the article of something here (your vague insult means you can pretend you meant whatever you want after the fact - no point in my guessing what you were accusing). But what I'm seeing is that you responded to a comment without reading the article, and still chose to insult the author of the article, and the publication itself to boot. You could have just answered the parent poster's question directly rather than randomly lambasting media. But that doesn't get upvotes.