4 ms·
From your write-up, it seems like you had only one reason in advance to doubt the assumption of Normally-distributed returns, and that was the existence of shor
by alimw 10y ago
From your write-up, it seems like you had only one reason in advance to doubt the assumption of Normally-distributed returns, and that was the existence of short-sellers in the market. Is that fair to say?
- FabHK 10y agoHe also mentions bi-modality, but yeah, not necessarily in relation to this stock. He also mentions the chart-technical argument that this stock was well supported and thus could not go down more, but I'd discount that argument very much.