3 ms·
Same here. In addition, the reasoning in the article doesn't sound sincere. If Google really cared about site speed, they would already promote fast pages more
by jwr 10y ago
Same here. In addition, the reasoning in the article doesn't sound sincere. If Google really cared about site speed, they would already promote fast pages more in their search results. They said they would, but it seems the boost is almost negligible.
I am worried by the attempts of several huge companies (Google & Facebook, mostly) to get more of the open internet under their control.
- blowski 10y agoWould you rather see a fast site with rubbish content, or a slow site with good content? My guess is that some altruistic folks at Google see AMP as a way of offering the best of both worlds. But most of us know that in big business, every good idea gets abused for short term profits.
- monochromatic 10y agoWhy is there any relation to the quality of the content?
- blowski 10y agoThe OP said Google aren't doing enough to promote fast sites. My point was that quality is more important than speed.
- monochromatic 10y agoQuality is orthogonal.