3 ms·
> and now (it probably has been updated) the reposter is respecting the terms of it The reposter still doesn't link back to the actual article as requested, th
by tom_mellior 10y ago
> and now (it probably has been updated) the reposter is respecting the terms of it
The reposter still doesn't link back to the actual article as requested, though that's just a "please" clause. I guess naming (and even linking) the author and giving the title suffices to satisfy the attribution clause of the license.
- StreakyCobra 10y ago> The reposter still doesn't link back to the actual article as requested, though that's just a "please" clause. I guess naming (and even linking) the author and giving the title suffices to satisfy the attribution clause of the license. Indeed, I thought there was a link to the blog post, but there is not any. The situation is different than before though, as the real author is now at least credited.