4 ms·
I like the screen-cap utility. All the rest seems useless, knowing that people already litter their desktops with a million icons.
by Zelmor 10y ago
I like the screen-cap utility. All the rest seems useless, knowing that people already litter their desktops with a million icons.
- leadingthenet 10y agoBut why duplicate the screen-cap utility already available on your OS (which works exactly the same way)? Do I not get it?
- sp332 10y agoIt does save the original URL with the screenshot, which I guess is convenient. I prefer Firefox's version which lets you snap individual elements precisely, but it's hard to use. ("Inspect element", then right-click the node and "screenshot node".) They do have an experimental first-party extension called Page Shot that makes this easier to use, and adds full-text search to boot! https://testpilot.firefox.com/ https://testpilot.firefox.com/
- lsh 10y agovivaldi has a screencap facility as well that will capture the whole web page or just selections of it. it's a fairly recent addition. prior to that it would take screencaps when record notes about a site but only the current viewframe.
- Mithaldu 10y agoThe screen-cap utility is the most useless thing they have to offer, as it'll inevitably recompress stuff that already had been compressed. It would be much more useful to have a tool to actually get you the link of the image you're seeing no matter how much the site tries to hide it.