3 ms·
It seems a little nefarious to blanket copy Matt Might's article, lead it with some emphasized and bolded statements that give the impression that the article i
by iplaw 10y ago
It seems a little nefarious to blanket copy Matt Might's article, lead it with some emphasized and bolded statements that give the impression that the article is the work of the poster and distract from the plain text attribution.
It looks like a bunch of hand-waving that results in a person skimming the article believing that the poster is the author.
- whorleater 10y agoYeah, the author of this repost doesn't even bother to fully follow all the license guidelines from Matt Might. Ironically this would be considered plagiarism in any academic setting.
- mohitchawla 10y agoAll the license guidelines are followed, MATT has been appropriately credited at the beginning as well as end of the article. The intent of the repost was to increase the reach of the awesome article. If you still want to, keep illustrating ironies. OR you could comment something that adds value of any kind to the community.
- iplaw 10y agoGreat ...