2 ms·

How does it compare to mozjpeg? (And, haha, WebP)

• ZeroGravitas 10y ago
  And the key question here is "What objective measures are they using to make these comparisons?" since testing every change against a scientifically valid subjective test with human subjects is impractical on many levels. If they have a bad measure, they could be fooling themselves into making things worse, if they have a good measure then lots of people could benefit from tweaking their graphic algorithms to do better against this measure. The fact that they seem to be putting the code before the justification worries me. Most recent efforts in codec and compression seem to spend a great deal of time and energy on getting this right, as it affects every single decision you make afterwards. edit: someone else posted a link where this question is answered, they're using this measure: https://github.com/google/butteraugli https://github.com/google/butteraugli