3 ms·Actually the radius is 5mm in the paper, it was nneonneo that got that part wrong.by Nition 10y agoActually the radius is 5mm in the paper, it was nneonneo that got that part wrong.pvg 10y agoThe wrong part doesn't come from the 5mm, it comes from being orders of magnitude wrong by some other method.Nition 10y agoOh, yeah I know. Didn't mean to imply your main point was incorrect.