3 ms·

Python doesn't market itself by telling it's memory-safe https://www.python.org/ https://www.python.org/ If a language frontpage is inexact I'll assume the res

• Manishearth 10y ago
  His point is that in the world of programming languages, "true memory safety" isn't really something achievable without making it impossible for your language to interact with things like native libraries or the OS. Given this, the concept of "true memory safety" isn't a useful one. In general when you say a language is memory safe, there's an implicit caveat that there may be explicit escape hatches. No language (except perhaps web-based JS) is "memory safe" by the strict definition so it's not a useful parameter to use when talking of languages. You instead use the weaker version. Terminology matters.
• kibwen 10y ago
  Can't tell if trolling or not. Python doesn't market itself as memory-safe because it's completely expected that scripting languages are memory-safe. The only domain where memory safety isn't taken as given is in systems programming, which is why Rust's safety guarantees are a big selling point.
  • p0nce 10y ago
    Not trolling. I'm just trying to convey a simple point. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13378183 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13378183 As it cost me 20+ downvotes to make a rational conversation with you all, I will stop interacting with the Rust community.