interesting comparison but it is a bit disingenuous there is more going on than just input in that reaction time figure 8fps fails to assume a reaction time o

interesting comparison but it is a bit disingenuous there is more going on than just input in that reaction time figure 8fps fails to assume a reaction time of 0.125s for the same reason that the human eye's ~220fps.. now this is a mental stretch of the true underlying mechanisms but i'll make it for sake of consistency of argument(o).. fails to imply a reaction time of .00454545s i guess i assumed autonomous vehicles sensor data would be measured in hertz, but now am intrigued by what framerate the computer vision system works (o) http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm