4 ms·
I've really liked Picnic CSS [1]. The main selling point for me is that it styles most elements by default without you having to add redundant classes everywher
by kej 10y ago
I've really liked Picnic CSS [1]. The main selling point for me is that it styles most elements by default without you having to add redundant classes everywhere. Instead of Bootstrap's <button class="btn btn-default btn-hover"> you just do <button> and Picnic makes it look nice. It also leaves your HTML uncluttered if you do need to move up to something like Bootstrap later on.
[1] http://picnicss.com/ http://picnicss.com/
- tedmiston 10y agoThanks, hadn't seen this one before. Looks like it was quite popular on HN when it was introduced [1]. I'm not totally sure I'd ever use it over Bootstrap, though perhaps for a small app since it's so light. That said, my first impression of Pure [2] was similar, which is ~4 kb. It's fallen out of fashion a bit, but I still find it useful for a lightweight front end. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8315616 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8315616 [2]: http://purecss.io http://purecss.io