> http://rust-lang.github.io/book/ch07-00-modules.html http://rust-lang.github.io/book/ch07-00-modules.html is the second edition of the book's chapter on it, I

> http://rust-lang.github.io/book/ch07-00-modules.html http://rust-lang.github.io/book/ch07-00-modules.html is the second edition of the book's chapter on it, I think it's much better. It is better, yes, although I think it takes a while getting to the point in a few places. Docs are something I'm interested in, so you might hear more from me through appropriate channels about this and that. > Yes, that is how it works. Macros aren't in a namespace. Yes, it's weird. It's an artifact of history; eventually, it will be fixed. I'm glad that I both got it right and that it's not necessarily going to stay that way. I don't know how much macros are going to proliferate in the future, but I don't want to find myself with macro naming collisions. I can certainly imagine some of nom's causing issues with other crates, and having to define a new crate within my tree just to contain them would be irritating. I assume that would work as a workaround, anyway.