3 ms·
Part of why we're impressed (and dismayed) is that they use a data URL to look like "accounts.google.com" and to load a remote script out of sight to the right
by et-al 10y ago
Part of why we're impressed (and dismayed) is that they use a data URL to look like "accounts.google.com" and to load a remote script out of sight to the right of all the spaces. Maybe the URL protocol didn't fool you, but I think there are a good number of users out there who have been "trained" to check the URL to see that it says "accounts.google.com" and think it's fine.
And while clicking on an attachment shouldn't sign out a user, being automatically signed out has happened enough to most people that it seems like a fairly innocuous event, especially since this is supposed to be an attachment, not a link, and you just need to sign back in. So one does.
- shadowlord 10y agoYes, getting automatically signed out is a normal thing. And of course, the user wouldn't suspect that it was the attachment that caused that. So yes, I see it now how this is a legitimate concern.
- Ajedi32 10y agoSo how is this any different from using a URL like `accounts.google.com.googlelogin.cz` instead? I mean, yes obviously using a `data:` URL is certainly creative, but is it really any more effective?