4 ms·
This desire of urban planners to regulate virtually every aspect of city life is precisely why I live in the suburbs. I like to remind budding conservatives an
by LordKano 10y ago
This desire of urban planners to regulate virtually every aspect of city life is precisely why I live in the suburbs.
I like to remind budding conservatives and libertarians that the free market is an ideal, not a mandate. The situation you describe is one that it perfect to be handled by the market. It's a cliche but it's also true that what matters is "Location, Location, Location". If you locate a business in an area where the people who would normally patronize it do not often travel or where they can't obtain adequate parking, that business will suffer.
- davidw 10y ago> regulate virtually every aspect of city life is precisely why I live in the suburbs. You could easily get the same thing out of a HOA in a city with fewer city-wide rules and regulations.
- LordKano 10y agoYou are absolutely right about that, I also would never buy a home in a community with a HOA.
- davidw 10y agoAh, I see what you are saying: you think that suburbs are not planned down to the most minute of details? I don't know where you live, but I bet if you read a copy of your local zoning code, and have a look at the zoning map, you will probably find that yes, your suburb is very, very heavily regulated, including parking minimums, minimum floor/area ratios, setbacks, uses, and so on and so forth. Probably less than some HOA's demand, but still a lot of details. I too am not the kind of person who relishes that level of control, but I suppose some people like it.
- LordKano 10y agoYou raise a valid point. I just looked at my local code book of ordinances and they do cover a lot, including the number of parking spaces by square footage. In my experience, in a smaller town, these things are primarily used as a weapon to punish otherwise bad businesses. For example, we had a bar whose patrons became a neighborhood nuisance. They began to enforce the letter of the law for every violation until the bar closed.
- davidw 10y agoThere's an alternate universe where these kinds of problems are entirely dealt with through nuisance and noise laws and that kind of thing: the bar is permitted wherever people want to build it, however, the local authorities come down hard on people being a PITA. So if it's a wine bar where middle aged people sip quietly and chat about business, it's not going to bother anyone. The rowdy biker bar probably won't last long in a residential area.
- WWLink 10y agoThat sounds pretty bad. If you make everything illegal then only selectively enforce the laws...
- LordKano 10y agoIn the USA, that seems to be the model at all levels of government.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- ocschwar 10y ago> This desire of urban planners to regulate virtually every aspect of city life is precisely why I live in the suburbs. That's a bizarre thing to say. Construction in the suburbs is far more tightly regulated in the suburbs than in the city.
- bobhall1981 10y agoThe argument that suburbs are some kind of liberty-loving small-government haven is 100% insane. I'm not here to say suburbs are good or suburbs are bad -- that's a value judgement. But there are facts: suburbs rely on federal dollars, central planning, lots of regulations (try opening up a corner store on the lot next to your suburban home), and limit individual choice.