3 ms·
on the other hand, owning a gun is close to attempted manslaughter, and that means no malintent, just accepting a not so faint possibilitt, whereas farming cann
by posterboy 10y ago
on the other hand, owning a gun is close to attempted manslaughter, and that means no malintent, just accepting a not so faint possibilitt, whereas farming cannabis sativa has a magnitudes smaller, negligable possibility. Disclaimer: I'm currently biased, if you know what I mean.
- dpark 10y ago> owning a gun is close to attempted manslaughter, and that means no malintent This is a pretty unreasonable statement unless farming marijuana is also "close" to giving drugs to children. I agree that machine guns are far more dangerous to allow in broad society than marijuana, but I don't think your comparison is very useful.
- posterboy 10y agoOf course I a admitted a degree of certainty and responsibility, that is required in either case. I just argue that it differs, because the lethal dose of cannabis is ridiculously high. But I can appreciate the Irony of the question, no doubt. Edit: wording Edit: well, the LD is probably not that high, i wouldn't recommend to try for it