3 ms·
It did, until it no longer did. With DOS and Win9x one could effectively replace everything underfoot of the OS and it would hardly blink. Yes it would fall ba
by digi_owl 10y ago
It did, until it no longer did.
With DOS and Win9x one could effectively replace everything underfoot of the OS and it would hardly blink. Yes it would fall back to 640x480 and 16 colors, and demand you install some new drivers, but beyond that you could do just about anything and it would still boot.
Come NT and you would just be greeted with a error screen and a demand that you did a recovery (that would effectively roll back all patches etc).
And these days you have to phone Microsoft if you try anything like it more than a couple times because you tripped their DRM checks.
Yes, one could wander into a solid case of "my grandfathers axe". But the various layers were independent enough that they would come up in some kind of state that you could work with.
Sadly i fear that Linux is heading into the NT realm with the changes to the graphics sub-system that has come in recent years.
Where before higher modes were the realm of X, and things like 3D acceleration was yet another semi-independent layer, these days the kernel may well give you an error if you do not have the right GPU driver compiled in.
- AstralStorm 10y agoIt will not. It should boot using either VESA, VGA or EFI video driver. Low resolution, no acceleration, potentially single monitor, but it will start. Even OpenGL will work via software emulation.
- pjc50 10y agoI have personally experienced it not working, by changing the motherboard+hard disk combo from IDE to SATA. No SATA drivers installed => system boots but Windows falls over as soon as it stops using the BIOS. (I can't remember exactly which version of Windows this was!)
- digi_owl 10y agoI think it was more a response to me jab towards changes to the Linux graphics stack.