Re ahistorical. So, lets do it opposite if you know history better than me. You're implying major reform happened with bright, risk-taking people who focused on

Re ahistorical. So, lets do it opposite if you know history better than me. You're implying major reform happened with bright, risk-taking people who focused on stuff nobody cared about without activity to bring in supporters outside tgat person's sphere and activity that consisted of sole person doing an act most people would find questionable. Because I think that (Aaron's) aporoach is ahistorical for creating social change.