3 ms·
A valid point! The economics of integration seems to be driving us towards single boxes which suit stifled competition? Is there an opening here for a non-man
by femto 10y ago
A valid point! The economics of integration seems to be driving us towards single boxes which suit stifled competition?
Is there an opening here for a non-manufacturing "open" standards body to emerge? They could publish mechanical specifications for a "click together phone" and a specification for a simple electrical bus/interconnect (use USB for everything?)
One could envisage a series of standard exterior cases, based on a common unit of measure. Each case might contain openings for screen, camera, connectors, etc. according to the type of device. Inside the case would be spaces for internal modules, also based on the common unit of measure, not specific to any one type of module and with interfaces in standard positions. Exterior cases in the series might include:
* Smartphone
* Tablet
* Laptop
* Desktop
* Media player
Such a movement could arise from the Makerspace movement, as it would be a relatively low cost thing to do? One can imagine a website with specification documents and 3D printer files for the various module outlines. People would then be free to experiment on making new components within this ecosystem.
---
Edit: I'm pessimistic that the above would progress past a hobbyist level as the economics favours an integrated approach, unless it spurs a level of competition and innovation that undercuts the premiums being charged by the makers of walled gardens.
- ocdtrekkie 10y agoIt basically won't happen until we have a competitive processor that's fully open. Nobody has a strong incentive to start a standards body when they can control a market instead. Even when Google was still working on Ara, they planned to release the "Endo", or base frame, itself, and then just let vendors sell modules with a similar OEM partnership to how they control Android OEMs today.