4 ms·
Being that cars operate in physical reality, my guess is the machine would ignore your obviously incorrect spike of data and rely instead on its LIDAR and camer
by dclowd9901 10y ago
Being that cars operate in physical reality, my guess is the machine would ignore your obviously incorrect spike of data and rely instead on its LIDAR and cameras.
Frankly, I see V2X as basically useless outside of coordinating complex maneuvers (high speed, high efficiency car trains on freeways or stopless intersections). But why even have it if the sensors are already aware of what's going on to a reasonable degree of 1-2 seconds of future reality?
- phinnaeus 10y agoWhen you have mutliple vehicles, each potentially with their own variant of control software, then each could be internally deterministic but "foreign" to the other vehicle. Kind of like a double pendulum. Edit: But also like that cool double/triple pendulum thing (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyN-CRNrb3E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyN-CRNrb3E) you don't necessarily have to be able to predict the future if you are simply monitoring the present state at a high enough sampling rate. Note that this thing is sampling at 1ms. Not sure what kind of sampling would be necessary for cars, certainly a function of velocity and braking power.