3 ms·
I'm sure they have a conversation at some point, and that conversation ends in an exchange of money for sex, even if they skirt around calling it that. Not tha
by hendersoon 10y ago
I'm sure they have a conversation at some point, and that conversation ends in an exchange of money for sex, even if they skirt around calling it that.
Not that there aren't men who sign up to a sugar baby site, date much younger very attractive girls, pay them, and don't have sex with them. I'm sure that exists too, but only because the client really doesn't want that service.
- iaw 10y agoThere's a few exchange archetypes for sugar babies: 1) Girl immediately exchanges sex for goods/cash (rarest) 2) Girl makes a sexual exchange after a courting period (most common) 3) Guy isn't interested in sex but a female companion for emotional support 4) Girl is pretending like she does #2 but actually drops off after courting period 5) Girl is actually doing #2 but the guy is too creepy There is an element of consent involved because of the delay and indirect aspect of monetary exchange. Many sugar babies will question what differs them from traditional girlfriends other than that they are clear about how the relationship progresses.
- hendersoon 10y agoYou clearly know what you're talking about! Yep, that all reads right to me. Prostitutes can consent. They aren't /obligated/ to have sex with you just because you have $400 in hand. If they are, they're being coerced/trafficked and that is very clearly morally not OK. Questioning the difference is another justification for the "I'm not really a prostitute" self-deception. Anyone that can't tell the difference between a sugar and normal relationship either has never /had/ a real relationship or is deeply materialistic to their core.