I think in that example, i would move the bar to exactly what you cited. I think there's an implicit understanding in the OPs statement that means "better than

I think in that example, i would move the bar to exactly what you cited. I think there's an implicit understanding in the OPs statement that means "better than average competent humans". Although, another way to look at is: If you fall below the bar for the average human, including drunks/etc, aren't you by definition more safe using this AI system? If your question/argument is: What about those who are safer than average - then i think the answer is, they shouldn't use self driving, only the "poor" drivers should. Of course the next question is how do you determine that. Perhaps infractions on your driving record would inhibit you from driving. If you get caught for drunk driving, that's it, no more license, purely automated driving (even if that means no rain driving, etc). If you're above 70, or etc.